Aug
19

99 vs 97 – Can You Help?

By on August 19, 2014 · Comments (4)

Costco price tag

Here is a recent question by email.

Thanks Mark for great blog and insightful book. I’m currently working my way through a Kindle edition, learned a lot about pricing that’s for sure and will definitely recommend to clients. One thing I didn’t see you talk about on your blog is the 9 vs 7 pricing gimmick. In the real world, most prices will end with a 9 or 5 occasionally (9.99, 99, etc.). But, online and especially with info products, there has been a trend to end price with a 7. For example, most ebooks and programs are 17, 27, 47, 67, 97, and so on. What’s your expert opinion on this? Have you seen any credible research that clearly shows which one is better? I know why we use 9.99 instead of a 10, but how effective is 7? Thanks a lot!

This question hits me close to home, particularly because my dissertation was on why firms use 99 cents as their price endings.  Although I’ve blogged on this before, here is a quick review.

The driving factor behind the effectiveness of 99 cents is that was are bad or lazy subtractors.  For example, a product that normally sells for $400 on sale for $299 feels like a much better deal than a product that normally sells for $399 on sale for $299.  The same happens when people are choosing between our product and a competitors.

That driving factor has led products that end in 99 to look to people like a good price.  The opposite of that is we have learned to associate prices that end in 00 with higher quality.

However, none of that answers the question posed above.  And unfortunately I don’t know the answer.  First, after searching on Amazon and iTunes, I still found that most prices end in 9 rather than 7.  Please feel free to share sites with prices that predominately end in 7.

I searched the academic literature and didn’t find anything either.  If you know of something, please share.

I found a couple discussion sites on software on this topic, and the conclusion was you should A/B test it to see which works for you.  In other words, there wasn’t a conclusion.

Don’t forget that many retailers use the right hand digit of a price to indicate the state of the product.  For example, Costco uses prices that end in 7 to indicate that the price has been marked down from the regular price (which ends in 9).  Gap and Old Navy use prices that end in 7 to indicate they are the final markdown, the lowest price they will go.  This means to me that they don’t think any psychological effect is very big, so they use the digit for internal communications.

At this point, I’m not satisfied with any answer.  If you have an answer, or evidence, or research, please share it.  We would all like to know.

 

Photo by thebayentrepreneur

 

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (4)
Aug
11

Is My $20 Book Worth $236?

By on August 11, 2014 · Comments (4)

Amazon_com__Buying_Choices__Impact_Pricing__Your_Blueprint_for_Driving_Profits

Last week, the least expensive paperback version of my book on Amazon was $236 even though the cover price is $20. Wow. The Kindle version was reasonably priced at $9.99. But $236? And it wasn’t just one company. There were multiple vendors offering my book in that price range.

What happened?

You may or may not know there are software applications vendors can use to automatically reprice products on Amazon, eBay and other online retail sites. These applications monitor competitors’ prices for products and then adjust the vendor’s prices up or down based on the situation. As examples, check out Appeagle, Feedvisor, and Repriceit.

First thing to know, about a year ago Amazon ran out of stock of my book and the publisher decided against a reprint.  Amazon no longer has stock.  The only new paperback versions you can buy are the ones in inventory at some smaller resellers.

Even with limited inventory, no sane person would price my book for $236 (even though it is surely worth it.) Instead, every Amazon reseller that has inventory of my book is also using one of these these software repricing applications. The software, without human intervention, slowly worked their price points up to unreasonable levels.

When I saw this, I decided to sell what small inventory I have just so more people can have a reasonably priced book, and because I wanted to watch what happened. I priced the book at $22 plus $3.99 for shipping and handling.

(As a quick aside, it was very easy to set up an Amazon reseller account.)

In the week since I listed my book at $22, the other resellers have started slowly lowering their prices. As of this writing, the next least expensive vendor now sells it for $118.50. It would not surprise me if within a few weeks other resellers have undercut my price. That would actually make me happy both because I was able to manipulate other vendors’ prices and because more people will get the chance to read it.

The lesson:  Is it possible to use some algorithm to constantly adjust your prices relative to competition and the market conditions? If so, it is probably a better bet than using the set it and forget it strategy (i.e. never change your price). However, even if you can use automation, you should still monitor the prices for ridiculousness. Although I’d like to believe that the information in my book is worth way more than $236, I doubt anyone buys it at that price.

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (4)
Aug
04

Should You Try Two-Part Pricing?

By on August 4, 2014 · Comments (1)

Cycle_Class_at_a_Gym

A student recently asked, “when does it make sense to use two-part pricing?”

First, let’s define two-part pricing. It is when you charge one fee up front, and then another fee as the product is used.

For example, popular bars have a cover charge and then charge for drinks as the night goes on. Health clubs have initiation fees then charge monthly rates. Country clubs have large initiation fees with monthly or annual dues.

In each of these examples, a customer cannot access the facility or the product without paying the up front fee. This works because customers get two different pieces of value, both of which they are paying for. For example, they get value from going to the bar and they get value from the drinks. They get value from having access to a workout facility and they get value from working out. They get value from saying they are a member of a country club and they get value from using it.

Of course this only works when you can control access to your facility or product.  People who have not paid the upfront fee cannot purchase the other products.

Two part pricing can also be used as a technique for price segmentation while building loyalty and increased demand. Amazon Prime is an upfront fee that gives you free shipping as you buy goods from them. But you don’t have to use Prime to buy from Amazon. Amazon gives you a choice.

Infrequent buyers or people who are not price sensitive probably will not purchase Prime. However, heavy users who are price sensitive will pay the fee to join Prime. Once these people have joined Prime, they are more likely to shop from Amazon than elsewhere.

So should you try two-part pricing? Sure, if your market conditions allow you to meet one of these two scenarios. Do you have a popular product that provides a lot more value to your customers than just the use they get? If so, you may try charging an up front fee, just like a country club.

Do you have a product that is frequently purchased and you have some users who are heavy users and price sensitive? Then try imitating Amazon Prime. You don’t have to force everyone to go this way.  Let the targeted segment reveal themselves.

 

Photo: “Cycle Class at a Gym” by www.localfitness.com.au

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (1)

discount stickers

Those of us not in sales often make fun of salespeople, well … because it’s fun. Our first gut reaction says of course we can’t give pricing authority to sales. They will only sell on price and we’ll be giving huge discounts to too many clients. Unfortunately, a lot of salespeople do sell on price. Besides, every customer asks for a discount and it’s easiest for sales to give them one.

However, who better to figure out how much a customer is willing to pay than sales? They have the relationship with the client. They have direct knowledge. If only we could find ways to keep salespeople from selling on price and instead use their close knowledge of the customer to discount when it’s needed.

The hard part is balancing these two opposing forces. The trick is to provide incentives and tools to help the sales people sell value instead of price. Here are four tips to help.

  1. Distribute authority throughout the sales hierarchy. You may give your salespeople the ability to discount 5%. Your sales managers can go to 10% and your sales directors down to 15%. Anything lower than 15% off has to be approved by headquarters. (The numbers are an example. Use what makes sense for your sales team.) The good thing about this is that one salesperson alone can’t do a lot of damage.
  2. Monitor, on a salesperson by salesperson basis, how much discount they tend to give away. Report it. No salesperson wants to be on the bottom of any list. Hopefully those salespeople who discount less can help the rest of the team learn how they do it.
  3. Talk to your sales team about NOT jumping to the maximum discount. Instead, start small. Every percentage can have a big impact on company profit.
  4. Create an incentive program that rewards the salespeople with the smallest discounts.  We often hear the saying, “salespeople are coin operated” meaning they do what they are paid to do.  Let’s pay them to not discount.

Finally, it is our responsibility to make sure sales has the right tools to be able to sell on value. Take a hard look at what you give your sales people and how that helps them sell value.

When we give sales the tools to sell value and the incentives to not discount too easily, we maximize our chances of winning business at the highest possible prices.

 

Picture by 92Five

Categories : Value
Comments (3)
Jul
21

Picking a Favorite Pricing Lesson

By on July 21, 2014 · Comments (0)

important

This past Thursday I taught the first fully released pricing course for Pragmatic Marketing. The day was better than I could have hoped. The students were energized, asked great questions, contributed their own stories and I’d like to believe they all walked out with a smile on their face and several action items to help them in their pricing endeavors.

However, about three quarters of the way through the class, I put up a slide and to emphasize its importance said, “this is my favorite slide.” A lady in the front decided to make fun of me by asking, “how many favorite slides do you have?” Embarrassingly, I had to admit that I’d said that line many times during the day. And it’s kind of true. There are so many great concepts in pricing that can help companies be more profitable. So many concepts that aren’t obvious and produce aha’s in the students. Many of these concepts seem to be my favorite.

But it did prompt me to think, “what should be my favorite slide? What is the most important concept in pricing?”

The answer: The most important concept in pricing is to price based on what your customers are willing to pay, not your costs.

I teach that concept first thing in the morning. Companies must use Value Based Pricing. Charge what your customers are willing to pay, not costs. There is a little pushback at first, but soon everybody nods their head and has accepted the concept, almost. Throughout the day, students sometimes make reference to why they needed to use costs to price. Of course I’d have to correct them. By the afternoon, they were catching themselves whenever they were about to mention costs again. It’s amazing how ingrained pricing based on costs really is.

What about you? You may nod as you read this, agreeing with me, but then do you go talk to your company about costs and pricing? It is fascinating that pricing based on costs has penetrated us so deeply that it’s hard to let go. That’s one reason I think Value Based Pricing is the most important concept.

The other reason though, if you don’t accept value based pricing, then you lose the power of all of the pricing strategies that come with it. There’s no need to segment pricing based on willingness to pay if you only price based on cost. You can’t take full advantage of a good-better-best strategy if you only price on costs. There’s no reason to think of pricing portfolios if you only use costs.

Yes, value based pricing is without a doubt the most important concept in pricing. But that doesn’t mean I can’t have more “favorite” slides does it?

 

Photo by Valerie Everett

Comments (0)
Jul
15

Freakonomics, Separating Equilibria, and Pricing

By on July 15, 2014 · Comments (1)

Think like a freak

Do you like Freakonomics? I sure do. Levitt and Dubner’s latest book, “Think Like a Freak”, is a fun read which I highly recommend. But I had to think hard about chapter 7, “What do King Solomon and David Lee Roth have in common?”.

If you haven’t read that chapter, you should, but here’s a very quick synopsis. (spoiler alert) Both King Solomon and David Lee Roth used game theory to create separating equilibria. This essentially means they set up a “game” so that people inadvertently reveal their true identities.

One of their examples was why David Lee Roth used to ask for M&M’s with all of the brown M&M’s taken out. At first glance this seems like another wacky, self-absorbed superstar demanding eccentric treatment. However, David Lee Roth added this requirement for a very strategic reason.

When they were touring, they had a wild show, with pyrotechnics, lights, complex stages and heavy speakers. If the stage was not set up exactly as the contract specified, someone could get hurt.  So how could Roth know which venues carefully read the contract and set up the stage according to specifications?  He needed a separating equilibrium where he could tell the two different types of venues apart.

So Roth buried a clause deep in the contract stating he wanted his special serving of M&M’s. When he showed up at a site, if his M&M’s were there, without brown ones, he was more confident that the contract was read and followed carefully. If not, they assumed the contract was not read carefully so they had to carefully check the entire setup.

Why is this a separating equilibrium? Because two different behaviors indicated two different “types”. Venues who didn’t read the contract carefully wouldn’t serve the M&M’s properly. Those who did read it would. Just by looking for M&M’s he was able to tell which group read the contract and which didn’t.

After reading this, two questions came to mind. 1. How do we set up our own separating equilibria? and 2. What does this have to do with pricing? Sorry, but I haven’t figured out how to answer question 1, but question 2 is what prompted this blog.

Is there a mechanism which produces a separating equilibrium whereby we can distinguish customers with high willingness to pay from customers with lower willingness to pay? Yes. Think coupons. Only people who are price sensitive go through the hassle of finding, clipping, storing, carrying and remembering to use coupons. People who are not price sensitive don’t.

We can use a similar concept to create more separating equilibria. In essence, anything that offers a discount for effort (or anything negative) would be a separating equilibrium. Imagine when you get to the grocery store checkout, the clerk offers you a discount if you let her stab your arm with a thumbtack. Some people, who are very price sensitive, might say yes. Most of us would not. That is a separating equilibrium.

Okay, maybe that last example was over the top. Besides coupons, are there any other separating equilibria in use in pricing today? Sure. Think about who shop at stores like Macy’s, who have frequent sales. Some people just walk in and buy what they want when they want it. They are not price sensitive and usually end up paying full price. Others wait for Macy’s to have a sale and then shop. Only price sensitive people are willing to wait.

Many stores, including Macy’s, will offer you a discount on a full price item if you ask. However, only price sensitive people have the gumption to be willing to ask for a discount. In January 2014 NPR’s This American Life (available on podcast) had a fun story on one of their producers trying to get the “good guy discount,” simply asking for a discount. It certainly doesn’t always work, but it does sometimes.

You never know when or where we can learn pricing lessons, but it’s certainly fun learning them from the Freakonomics guys.

Comments (1)

plate-223322_640

Pragmatic Marketing’s box of the month is Innovation. At first glance, what does pricing have to do with innovation? After all innovation is about solving customer problems. Usually with new technologies and capabilities. It’s about new products.  It’s about invention.

But wait.

Innovation is about solving customer problems. We sometimes have the chance to innovate using business models. When you hear the phrase “business model” you should think “pricing”.

Netflix changed the business model for renting DVD’s from daily rentals to a monthly fee. They solved the problem that people didn’t want to pay late fees.

In October, 2007, Radiohead (a music group) used “Pay As You Wish” pricing for their album In Rainbows. This solved the problem of prices being too high to attract new listeners, but still collected revenue from their fans.

In 2013, Kid Rock announced he would lower ticket prices and make up that revenue with a share of the concessions. Again, solving the problem of price being too high to attract new fans.

There are many more possible new business models. Freemium has become huge in many software businesses. (think LinkedIn). Uber changed the business model for taxis. Airbnb changed the business models for nightly rooms. Craigslist changed (obliterated) the business model for classified ads. The list could go on for a very long time.

The big question though, how can you change your business model? Should you?

Here’s an idea. Determine what your customers purchase from you. Not the physical product, but the benefit. Can you deliver that benefit another way?

Think back to your college marketing class where you probably heard the lesson from Harvard Business School Professor Ted Levitt: “People don’t want to buy a quarter inch drill. They want to buy a quarter inch hole.” If you are currently selling drills, realize your customers are actually buying holes. Is there the possibility of a new business model? Absolutely.

Back to Netflix. Customer buy the experience to watch a movie in their own family room. They weren’t “renting DVD’s”. Netflix found a new business model to serve that need.

Your homework for today, think hard about what your customers actually purchase from you. What is the benefit they are trying to achieve? Then, determine what gets in their way of more efficiently reaching that benefit. That is where you may find an opportunity for innovation in pricing.

Oh, instead of thinking about what, why and how your customers purchase, you might actually try asking them. :-)

 

Picture by Pixabay

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (1)
Jul
01

Psychological Pricing Is Overrated

By on July 1, 2014 · Comments (1)

half full half empty

Psychological pricing is fun. In this field we get to study the effects of prospect theory (where losses loom larger than gains) to yield such odd behavior as the endowment effect (where we value what we have more than if we didn’t own it) and reference pricing (where we use the price we expect to pay in our decision making). We also have price endings, anchoring, dominated alternatives, good-better-best, and many more pricing tactics.

Psychological pricing can be defined as using pricing to take advantage of buyers’ lack of rationality. The books on this topic are quite fun to read. I recommend Dan Ariely’s book Predictably Irrational.

Experience shows that some of these tactics are pretty powerful while others are more interesting than impactful. Good-better-best and reference pricing are two that typically have a major impact. However …

Psychological pricing tactics pale in comparison to pricing for value.

Pricing for value (aka value based pricing) means understanding what your customers are willing to pay and charging as near to that as possible.  If you are not yet committed to value based pricing, then focusing on psychology has minimal effect. By far the biggest impact you can have to your profitability is to adopt value based pricing. After you’ve adopted this most powerful pricing strategy, then you can worry about the psychological effects.

 

Picture by Pixabay

Categories : 5. Psychology
Comments (1)

Call-for-price

Question: My company provides training for more than 30 courses. There are 4 other companies which also provide the same courses but they do not show their prices on their website, they tell the price when a customer calls them. Till now whatever price I had shown on the website they used to charge 10% less than that. What should be my strategy now to increase my market share and revenue?

Answer: First, from the tenor of the question, it sounds like you believe that almost every purchase is a price decision. In other words, customers only purchase the lowest priced alternative. My first advice, is to stop believing that. Your company needs to create more value than your competitors. You can do this by offering more capabilities than your competitors, by delivering and proving higher quality, by building a better brand name, and even by better marketing. If your market believes you offer a truly better product, they would likely pay 10% more for it.

Second, if you believe strongly you are losing on price and you don’t want to, consider adding a price matching policy on your website. “We match all competitor prices.” This one policy has three great effects:

  1. Customers may come back to you if they find a lower priced competitor.
  2. Customers may believe you have the lowest price and won’t shop around.
  3. Competitors may stop undercutting your price because they know you will match their price. Competing on price just lowers everyone’s profits.

Third, considering raising your prices. If you really believe your competitors simply price at 10% below your published price, by raising prices you can raise industry profits (including yours). Then, you also have the ability to offer discounts to any customer who calls in to complain about price. Of course, if your competitors won’t follow you with higher prices, then you probably don’t want to do this.

Of all three of these, the first is the most important. Create value. Communicate value. Prove your product is worth more than your competitors.

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (1)
Jun
11

Pricing and Sales Revisited

By on June 11, 2014 · Comments (0)

Two days ago I published a blog on helping your sales team win at your price.   I just read this insightful blog from Mark Hunter, a sales expert, on “Why Your Sales Team is So Afraid of Price“.

My favorite quote from Hunter’s piece:  “If price is the reason a customer will or won’t buy, then there is no reason to have salespeople.”  What he is saying is it’s frequently something other than price that drives buyers’ decisions.  Hunter gives us 4 ways to help sales deal with price.

  1. Management must embrace and support the price.
  2. Salespeople must have a solid understanding as to why the price is the price
  3. Salespeople must be trained on how to handle the price question when it comes up on a sales call.
  4. Salespeople must be confident in their selling skills, including communicating the price with clarity and eye contact.

As pricing and product people, we are responsible for making sure #2 happens.  That was the point of my earlier blog.  Sales has to be able to sell (items 3 and 4), but WE have to arm them with the knowledge and tools that define our value.  They won’t get this without our help.

 

Categories : Execution
Comments (0)
Other Stuff...

Top Product Management Blogs